The huge popularity and
strong influence of social media has revolutionised the way people impart and
receive information. One of the ways social media differ from mainstream media
is that it empowers individuals by providing them a platform for publication of
their personal views to a large number of audiences. While the ease of
publication is great for self-expression, it poses as a problem for businesses
when negative consumer experiences are shared on social media. The rapid spread
of such information can place businesses in risk of serious financial losses.
While there are defamation acts in place to ease the damage from false reports,
there is a need to look into better ways to protect and uphold the online
reputation of businesses by taking on and improving the current social customer
relationship management system (SCRM).
In the digital age, the
online reputation of businesses is of fundamental importance regardless of
whether a business is based online or offline. Studies have reported that 86%
of customers buying decisions were influenced by negative online reviews
(Gesenhues, 2013) and poor customer service has resulted in costing U.S
businesses a staggering 41 billion loss a year (Strong, 2014). This reflects an
underlying importance in maintaining the online reputation of a business as it
can directly affect customers’ opinions, trust and ultimately sales of a
business. Unfortunately, to exacerbate the problem further, a study has shown
that bad customer service interactions are more likely to be shared than good
ones (Marketing Charts, 2013). This was of evidence in a local incident, where
a blog post of IKEA’s successful attempt to fix the situation of an unhappy
customer only warranted half the amount of shares (five thousand shares), as compared to the blog
post that condemned IKEA’s sorry attempt at customer service (ten thousand shares). This
negativity bias further emphasises the importance of protecting, over repairing, the reputation of a business as efforts to correct a wrong will not be as widespread as the wrong.
As of current context,
reputations of businesses are not well protected by laws and regulations. While
defamation acts are in placed to protect businesses against defamation, they are
unable to protect reputations as long as any statements made are based on a
factual experience. Freedom of speech also means that subjective opinions
of customers are allowed so long they are based on objective experiences.
The presence of subjective opinions becomes even more problematic because they
can intensify a problem through exaggerations and or by evoking emotions in
other readers. In the IKEA incident that was previously mentioned, the author
demonstrated this by calling for readers to “avoid IKEA at all cost” and also
included subjective opinions explaining that he was "a very very easy going man and this is my first and possibly only negative review because you guys screwed up big time”. Statements as such uses comparative measures
to aggravate the issue, yet it may or may not be true if it was experienced by
another individual and compared to other negative experiences. In such cases,
defamation acts cannot be used to demand for the withdrawal of such statements and
businesses are ultimately left to deal with such issues without much regulation
although it could be unfair to them.
Under such circumstances,
many businesses are looking to protect their reputation by improving and
maintaining positive customer relationships. One of the practices is to move
away from traditional customer relationship management (CRM), and adapting to a
more interactive and dynamic practice of social customer relationship
management (SCRM). SCRM revolves around customer opinions where the crucial components
that define SCRM are advocacy and experience. SCRM also uses social media and
technologies to track customers’ opinions on social networking platforms and
interact with customers on a personal level. This practice allows businesses to
find, analyse and evaluate problems at ground level that might be
individualistic or across board in nature. However, there are still problems
with SCRM that are avoidable and to be improved on, one of which is to provide
real-time help to customers. Not responding to customers in a timely fashion
and requiring customers to repeatedly enquire about the same issue result in
disappointment and unhappiness. In fact, a study finds that real time help
produced significant benefits to a company such as increased customer satisfaction
and increased customer retention (Strong, 2014). Efficiency is vital especially
when customers are bounded by time constraints and in need of an immediate
solution. Many companies, as with IKEA, failed to set up a proper system or
department that is specialised in engaging customers in an effective manner. As
previously mentioned, this problem is avoidable and there are companies with an
excellent system set up to implement SCRM in the right way, one of which is “Mi
Singapore”, where comments on their official Facebook page are attended to
everyday within a few hours after posting.
Ultimately, the most
important aspect in customer relationship management is for companies to
consider the feedbacks of customers and modify their business model or practices
accordingly. Businesses need to be sincere in communicating with customers and
provide commendable service whenever possible. If offline businesses are able
to provide excellent services, there will not be a need to worry about
inflammatory or damaging remarks on the social media.
(878 words)
References:
Brandweiner, N (2012, May 31). Customers more likely to share bad service experiences. My Customer. Retrieved from http://www.mycustomer.com/topic/customer-experience/customers-more-likely-share-bad-service-experiences-study/143371
Customers increasingly turn to social media to share bad customer experiences. Omega Management Group Corp. Retrieved from http://www.omegascoreboard.com/news/customer-service-horror-stories/consumers-increasingly-turn-to-social-media-to-share-bad-customer-experiences/
Gesenhues, A (2013, April 9). Survery: 90% of customers say buying decisions are influenced by online reviews. Marketing Land. Retrived from http://marketingland.com/survey-customers-more-frustrated-by-how-long-it-takes-to-resolve-a-customer-service-issue-than-the-resolution-38756
Greenslade, R (2014, October 20) 23% increase in defamation actions as social media claims rise. The Guardian, Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/media/greenslade/2014/oct/20/medialaw-social-media
Josiah, M (2011, June 17).
Hotel online reputation research statistics and quotes. Review
Pro. Retrieved from http://www.reviewpro.com/reputation-research-statistics-2767
Morgan, J (2010, November
3). What is Social CRM? Social Media Examiner. Retrieved
from http://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/what-is-social-crm/
Ng, C.B (2014, November
14). IKEA referred to my kitchen as a shit job and here's why you should avoid
getting your kitchen there at all costs. [web log post]. Retrieved
from
http://charlesbenedict.com/2014/11/14/ikea-referred-to-my-kitchen-as-a-shit-job-and-heres-why-you-should-avoid-getting-your-kitchen-there-at-all-costs/
Ng, C.B (2014, Decemeber
8). IKEA says sorry and gives me a spankingly beautiful new kitchen. [Web
log post] Retrieved
from http://charlesbenedict.com/2014/12/08/ikea-says-sorry-and-gave-me-a-spankingly-beautiful-new-kitchen/
Strong, F (2014, January 2). The complicated problem of social CRM. Sword and the Script. Retrieved from http://www.swordandthescript.com/2014/01/problem-social-crm/
1. What do you like the best about the ideas in this essay?
ReplyDelete- Effective reasoning/argument that are well substiatiated with examples (IKEA & statistics). Understandable transitions.
2. Is there a clear, narrowly-focused problem presented in the essay? Is it contextualized in the intro? Is it expressed well in the thesis?
- Problem with the rapid spread of negative consumer experience for organisations due to advent of social media, clearly stated in the introduction paragraph, expressed well in the thesis.
3. How well is the first solution described? How effectively is that solution evaluated?
- Problem 1 clearly described. Issue of businesses not adequately protected from customers’ opinions with relavent examples. For the solution, I like how the author brought up current legislation already in place. Evaulated the effectiveness of the legislation before bringing up the alternative solution.
5. Are there any ideas in the essay that need further development? Which parts of the essay require further elaboration?
- Briefly touched on CRM, I think it will be better to elaborate and contrast the idea of the old CRM before going into the new SCRM. Readers will then have a clearer idea of why the old system didn’t work compared to the new system.
6. Does the writer effectively use outside source material to illustrate the problem and/or the solutions
- Yes, examples of IKEA and statistics by various authors used to substantiate his points
7. What is your impression of the flow of the content?
- Flow in general is smooth. Transitions between paragraphs are clear with each pragraph describing one clear idea
8. Are there any ideas in the essay that are not clear or that you find confusing? Underscore/ highlight these.
- Not applicable. Smooth and easy to read.
9. Are the citations used in this essay appropriate? Are the reporting verbs effectively used? Does the reference list adhere to the APA guidelines?
- Not applicable
10. Can you give a couple specific suggestions for how the writer could most improve this essay?
- I am not sure if its correct to include casual remarks made by people into a formal essay (remarks on ikea, 5k/10k shares). Might be better if you substitute it with formal writing.
1. What do you like the best about the ideas in this essay? Be specific. (precise vocabulary, cohesive/linked ideas, clear/easy to follow discussion, convincing, effective reasoning/argument, well-developed ideas, well-supported topic sentences, understandable transitions, etc.)
ReplyDelete-What I like about the essay is that it is based on a uncommon topic and well supported with evidence (bringing in a local case study).
2. Is there a clear, narrowly-focused problem presented in the essay? Is it contextualized in the intro? Is it expressed well in the thesis?
- Yes, both the problem and thesis is clearly stated and specific in the essay. The contextualized of problem is bought in later, perhaps you want to state it in the first paragraph? If possible, you can also use statistics found in Singapore if you are doing on the local context.
3. How well is the first solution described? How effectively is that solution evaluated?
-I thought that the first solution can be describe with more details. You seems to just 'touch and go' on that point. By describing it with more details, your evaluation will also be more objective and balance since you are not just touching on the limitation of the defamation act.
4. How well is the second solution described? Is it effectively connected to a positive outcome?
- The second solution was given a lot more details, enabling me to understand fully what the system is about. It is effectively connected to a positive outcome as you stated the benefits of SCRM and how companies can implement it in the right way to serve customers better.
5. Are there any ideas in the essay that need further development? Which parts of the essay require further elaboration?
- I felt that the defamation act can be further elaborated.
6. Does the writer effectively use outside source material to illustrate the problem and/or the solutions?
-Yes, sources are used to provide statistics and evidence to illustrate problem and explained the solution implemented.
7. What is your impression of the flow of the content?
The flow of the content is smooth, it was easy to understand and I did not feel that any points introduce were out of place.
8. Are there any ideas in the essay that are not clear or that you find confusing? Underscore/ highlight these.
- As mentioned above, the defamation act can be further elaborated.
9. Are the citations used in this essay appropriate? Are the reporting verbs effectively used? Does the reference list adhere to the APA guidelines?
-Citations used were appropriate and reporting verbs such as 'find' and 'suggest' were used effectively. Reference list looks good, just need to put in all the in-text citations (:
10. Can you give a couple specific suggestions for how the writer could most improve this essay?
- Contextualized your essay in the first paragraph and if possible. provide statistics based on local context (instead of US). Elaborate more on your first solution (: Thanks for the enjoyable read, hope the feedback helps!